The Ultimate Guide to Lawyers
Functions of Commercial Litigation Attorneys
Any time you have disagreements between you and your business partners, or in the course of your business, you need to seek the services of a commercial litigation attorney. These are lawyers who are skilled in commercial litigation law, which is part of business law. There are highly sought after whenever a case comes up that involves the violation of contracts, or disputes have arisen between business partners, or even with their shareholders. This law is also applicable in collections. For this, you will need a litigation attorney to start legal proceedings of attaching assets or bumped up wages, which will be part of the collection process. They shall represent either defendants or plaintiffs. They hardly handle any other kinds of work, like submission of trademark registrations, or incorporation of businesses.
Litigation attorney attend to a lot of legal issues. Their clients normally have many issues that need their input, or disagreements that cover contractual agreements, all the way to multifaceted real estate disagreements. Lawyers who have chosen the path of commercial litigation law will only practice this branch, and no other, even if it is in business law. They are not concerned with business law variations. If you do not get a commercial litigation attorney at a particular law firm, expect them to give you excellent referrals of one.
A commercial litigation attorney who is great at it usually has considerable experience as a trial lawyer. Normally, they work towards getting those matters settled before they reach the courts. If this is not possible, they will rely on their experience as trial lawyers to argue and win the case, along with the evidence presented. In their normal daily operations, they shall prepare for a case, then argue it in court, and if unsuccessful, file an appeal. There are variations in how they charge for their services, either on an hourly basis, or on a flat rate basis.
In some cases, they shall represent a defendant or a plaintiff in a legal malpractice case. In such cases, the petitioner has to show the court how the lawyer they has in their case was not good enough in handling their case through their services. There has to be proof that as a result, the petitioner suffered loss. Showing the presence and extent of the harm is not enough. They have to show that had the lawyer done their job, none of it would have happened. Cases that concern legal malpractice are under the category of commercial litigation, as the lawyer being put on trial has provided legal services to the petitioner, which qualifies as a business.
You can contact Jeffrey Benjamin whenever you need help in such litigation matters.
Recommended reference: i was reading this